This case involves apportionment of community and separate property business interests.
- Case Title: Euphrasia Van Camp, Respondent, v. Frank Van Camp, Appellant/Euphrasia Van Camp, Appellant v. Frank Van Camp, Responent
- Case Cite: 53 Cal. App. 17, 199 P. 885
- Date: May 26, 1921
- Court: Second Appellate District, Division One
This case involves allocation of real property interests.
- Case Title: In re the Marriage of NANCY E. and SULLIVAN S. MARSDEN. NANCY E. MARSDEN, Respondent, v. SULLIVAN S. MARSDEN, Appellant.
- Case Cite: 130 Cal.App.3d 426, 274 P.2d 951
- Docket: 47922, 51438
- Date: April 1, 1982
- Court: California Court of Appeal, First District, Division Three
- Counsel: Robert J. Smith for Appellant. T. Patrick Hannon, N. Perry Moerdyke, Jr., and Moerdyke & Hannon for Respondent.
This case reflects the proper time period to determine income for support calculations.
- Case Title: In re Marriage of SUSAN and TRACY RIDDLE. SUSAN RIDDLE, Respondent, v. TRACY RIDDLE, Appellant.
- Case Cite: 125 Cal.App.4th 1075, 23 Cal.Rptr.3d 273
- Docket: G033414
- Date: January 14, 2005
- Court: California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three
- Trial J.: N. A. Pollard, J., Orange County
- Counsel: John R. Schilling for Appellant. No appearance for Respondent.
This case involves allocation of real property interests.
- Case Title: In re the Marriage of LYDIE D. and DAVID E. MOORE. DAVID E. MOORE, Appellant, v. LYDIE D. MOORE, Respondent.
- Case Cite: 28 Cal.3d 366, 168 Cal.Rptr. 662, 618 P.2d 208
- Docket: 24172
- Date: October 30, 1980
- Court: Supreme Court of California
- COUNSEL: F. J. Donehue for Appellant. Andrew G. Wagner and Milch, Wolfsheimer, Wagner & Schmidt as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant. Sullivan, Rizzo & Eisenberg and Ralph A. Rizzo for Respondent. Daniel W. Gridle and Gade, Grindle & Hayne as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.