In re Marriage of Dawnel and Frank Bonvino Findings Change Precedence in Real Property Apportionment Calculations (Part 1)

Approximately three years after their marriage, Dawnel and Frank Bonvino purchased a family home in Westlake Village with a down payment from husband’s resources and the proceeds from a loan in his name.  The property was purchased in 1996. Title to the home was taken in Frank’s name as sole and separate property.  Approximately 15…

In re Marriage of Dawnel and Frank Bonvino: Part 2 – Findings of the Court of Appeal

Frank Bonvino’s Appeal Frank Bonvino based his appeal of the trial court’s decision on the contention that there was no evidence he transmuted his separate property to community property.  By plain language of this statute, Family Code §2640 applies to separate property contributions that are traceable from a community property asset at dissolution.  Section 2640…

Euphrasia Van Camp, Respondent, v. Frank Van Camp, Appellant/Euphrasia Van Camp, Appellant v. Frank Van Camp, Respondent

By Ron J. Anfuso, CPA, ABV, CFF, CDFA, FABFA* Case Cite: 53 Cal. App. 17, 199 P. 885Date: May 26, 1921Court: Second Appellate District, Division One This case involved apportionment of community and separate property business interests Background: In March of 1916, when Frank Van Camp married Euphrasia, he was the president and general manager…

Important Family Law Cases: Anna Agnes Pereira, Respondent, v. Frank Pereira, Appellant

By Ron J. Anfuso, CPA, ABV, CFF, CDFA, FABFA This case involves apportionment of community and separate property for business interests and provides the guidelines for Forensic Accountants in valuing the community property interest in premarital businesses for dissolution cases. Background: Family Code §770 states that when a spouse owns a business at the date…